Does the addition of visceral manipulation alter outcomes for patients with low back pain? A randomized placebo controlled trial.

This study aimed to investigate whether the addition of visceral manipulation, to a standard physiotherapy algorithm, improved outcomes in patients with low back pain. Sixty-four patients with low back pain who presented for treatment at a private physiotherapy clinic were randomized to one of two groups: standard physiotherapy plus visceral manipulation (n = 32) or standard physiotherapy plus placebo visceral manipulation (n = 32). The primary outcome was pain (measured with the 0-10 Numerical Pain Rating Scale) at 6 weeks. Secondary outcomes were pain at 2 and 52 weeks, disability (measured with the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire) at 2, 6 and 52 weeks and function (measured with the Patient-Specific Functional Scale) at 2, 6 and 52 weeks. The addition of visceral manipulation did not affect the primary outcome of pain at 6 weeks (-0.12, 95% CI = -1.45 to 1.21). There were no significant between-group differences for the secondary outcomes of pain at 2 weeks or disability and function at 2, 6 or 52 weeks. The group receiving addition of visceral manipulation had less pain than the placebo group at 52 weeks (mean 1.57, 95% CI = 0.32 to 2.82). Participants were adequately blinded to group status and there were no adverse effects reported in either group.

This study suggests that visceral manipulation in addition to standard care is not effective in changing short-term outcomes but may produce clinically worthwhile improvements in pain at 1 year.

Cervical Arterial Dysfunction

Join Dr Roger Kerry to learn how to make safe clinical decisions taking into account the risks associated with Cervical Arterial Dysfunction (CAD) based on the latest evidence and framework.


Derek Laidler
Derek Laidler
October 22, 2015 at 9:53 pm

I would suggest that visceral manipulation would only be effective for those episodes of back pain with an underlying visceral cause and without establishing whether that’s the case in the first instance it’s a pointless study and misses the point of the treatment modality. Your tone suggests that you’re not convinced by visceral manipulation but I may be wrong. Ignoring the problems that visceral tissue can cause limits our ability to effectively treat many problems that manifest themselves as musculoskeletal problems. Try treating back pain in a group of patients with crohns or colitis and see how many fail to respond to ‘traditional’ treatment.

Speak your mind

Your email will not be published.