A perspective for considering the risks and benefits of spinal manipulation in patients with low back pain

John D. Childs, Timothy W. Flynn and Julie M. Fritz

The purpose of this study was to determine if patients who do not receive manipulation for their low back pain (LBP) are at an increased risk for worsening disability compared to patients receiving an exercise intervention without manipulation. One hundred and thirty-one consecutive patients with LBP were randomly assigned to receive manipulation and an exercise intervention or an exercise intervention without manipulation. The results show that patients who completed the exercise intervention without manipulation were eight times more likely to experience a worsening in disability than patients who received manipulation. The authors conclude that the results of this study offer an additional perspective for considering the risks and benefits of spinal manipulation and help to inform the integration of current evidence for spinal manipulation into healthcare policy.

Manual Therapy, Volume 11, Issue 4, November 2006, Pages 316-320

View Abstract

Full article withAthens login

Neck Pain

Out of all 291 conditions studied in the Global Burden of Disease 2010 Study, neck pain ranked 4th highest in terms of disability and 21st in terms of overall burden.
News article posted by: Rachael Lowe

Rachael Lowe is Co-Founder and Executive Director of Physiopedia. A physiotherapist and technology specialist Rachael has been working with Physiopedia since 2008 to create a resource that provides universal access to physiotherapy knowledge as well as a platform for connecting and educating the global physiotherapy profession.

Speak Your Mind

*