Patient education with or without manual therapy compared to a control group in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip

The author’s purpose in this study was to examine the effectiveness of a patient education (PE) program with or without the added effect of manual therapy (MT) compared to a minimal control intervention (MCI). In a single-center university hospital setting, a total of 118 patients with clinical and radiographic unilateral hip osteoarthritis (OA) from primary care were randomized into one of three groups: PE, PE plus MT or MCI. The PE was taught by a physiotherapist involving five sessions. The MT was administered by a chiropractor involving 12 sessions and the MCI included a home stretching program. Primary outcome was patient-reported pain severity on an 11-box numeric rating scale (NRS) immediately following a 6-week intervention period. Patients were followed for 1 year. Primary analysis included 111 patients (94%). In the combined group (PE + MT), a clinically relevant reduction in pain severity compared to the MCI of 1.90 points (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.9-2.9) was achieved. Effect size (Cohen’s d) for the PE + MT minus the MCI was 0.92 (95% CI 0.41-1.42). Number needed to treat for PE + MT was 3 (95% CI 2-7). No difference was found between the PE and MCI groups, with mean difference 0.0 (95% CI -1.0 to 1.0). At 12 months, not including patients receiving hip surgery the statistically significant difference favoring PE + MT was maintained.

They found that for primary care patients with OA of the hip, a combined intervention of MT and PE was more effective than a MCI. PE on its own was not found to be better than the MCI.

 

Knee Assessment and Hip Mechanics

Learn how how faulty hip and pelvis mechanics influence knee function under load with this short online course.

Speak your mind

Your email will not be published.