Cost-effectiveness evaluation of an RCT in rehabilitation after lumbar spinal fusion: a low-cost, behavioural approach is cost-effective over individual exercise therapy.

Søgaard R, Bünger CE, Laurberg I, Christensen FB

The objective of this study was to conduct an evaluation to investigate the cost-effectiveness of (1) a low-cost rehabilitation regimen with a behavioural element and (2) a regimen of individual exercise therapy, both in comparison with usual practice, from a health economic, societal perspective. 90 patients having had posterolateral or circumferential fusion were randomized 3 months after surgery. Validated pain- and disability index scales were applied at baseline and at 2 years postoperative. The probability of the behavioural approach being cost-effective was close to 1 given pain as the prioritized effect measure, and 0.8 to 0.6 given disability as the prioritized effect measure. The probability of the exercise therapy approach being cost-effective was modest due to inferior effectiveness. Results proved robust to relevant sensitivity analysis although a differentiated cost-effectiveness ratio between males and females was suspected.

A simple behavioural extension, of setting up group meetings for patients, to a regimen with a strict physiotherapeutic focus was found cost-effective, whereas the cost-effectiveness of increasing frequency and guidance of a traditional physiotherapeutic regimen was unlikely in present trial setting.

European Spine Journal, 2008, 17(2), 262-71

Link to Abstract

Principles of Exercise Rehabilitation

Join Lee Herrington to explore the fundamentals of physical stress theory, the effects of loading, mobility and rigidity and the influence of pain, to improve the foundations of all your…

Speak your mind

Your email will not be published.