SÃ¸gaard R, BÃ¼nger CE, Laurberg I, Christensen FB
The objective of this study was to conduct an evaluation to investigate the cost-effectiveness of (1) a low-cost rehabilitation regimen with a behavioural element and (2) a regimen of individual exercise therapy, both in comparison with usual practice, from a health economic, societal perspective. 90 patients having had posterolateral or circumferential fusion were randomized 3 months after surgery. Validated pain- and disability index scales were applied at baseline and at 2 years postoperative. The probability of the behavioural approach being cost-effective was close to 1 given pain as the prioritized effect measure, and 0.8 to 0.6 given disability as the prioritized effect measure. The probability of the exercise therapy approach being cost-effective was modest due to inferior effectiveness. Results proved robust to relevant sensitivity analysis although a differentiated cost-effectiveness ratio between males and females was suspected.
A simple behavioural extension, of setting up group meetings for patients, to a regimen with a strict physiotherapeutic focus was found cost-effective, whereas the cost-effectiveness of increasing frequency and guidance of a traditional physiotherapeutic regimen was unlikely in present trial setting.
European Spine Journal, 2008, 17(2), 262-71