A prospective study of mechanical physiotherapy for lumbar disk prolapse: five year follow-up and final report.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term effect of a specific conservative treatment method for patients with lumbar disc prolapse. Background data: Low back pain and symptoms of disc herniation have a good prognosis. Yet the rates of disability and sick-leave because of recurrences are high and cost-intensive. Fifty consecutive patients with clinically and neuroradiologically confirmed lumbar disk prolapse, who responded to the first five daily physiotherapy sessions with pain centralization, were prospectively treated with mechanical physiotherapy with repeated end range spinal movements and leg movements. The results after one year of follow-up have been published previously (J Neurology 250 (2003), 746-749). From the initial cohort of 50 patients, 5 patients were operated within one year after discharge and one patient died. One patient had surgery for disc prolapse 13 months after discharge. Three patients were lost for follow-up. None of the 40 remaining patients has had surgery until the last follow-up.
Pain centralization during the first 5 treatment sessions of mechanical physiotherapy is a useful diagnostic tool to predict a good longterm outcome. Mechanical physiotherapy with end range spinal movements and leg movements is an effective treatment strategy for many patients with lumbar disk disease.
Related posts:
- Lumbar disk prolapse: Response to mechanical physiotherapy in the absence of changes in magnetic resonance imaging. Report of 11 cases.
- Does Discography Cause Accelerated Progression of Degeneration Changes in the Lumbar Disc: A Ten-Year Matched Cohort Study.
- A prospective, randomised trial of immediate exercise following lumbar microdiscectomy: a preliminary study
- Four-year follow-up of surgical versus non-surgical therapy for chronic low back pain.
- Intramuscular Oxygen-Ozone Therapy in the Treatment of Acute Back Pain With Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Clinical Trial of Active and Simulated Lumbar Paravertebral Injection
