Psychometric properties of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire compared to the Oswestry Disability Index: a systematic review

The objective of this study was to compare the psychometric properties of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Index used to measure physical ability in people with low back pain. Twenty-three articles were reviewed using an adult population over 18 years old with acute, sub-acute and chronic low back pain.  The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Index demonstrate good reliability in test-retest performance clinically at initial evaluation and up to 6 weeks following interventions. Two studies described the construct validity of the two measures as highly correlated with each other. Overall, it appears that both questionnaires have similar responsiveness rates of 0·76-0·78 but two studies report a responsiveness rate of 0·94 for the Oswestry.

The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire is most sensitive for patients with mild to moderate disability while the Oswestry Disability Index is most effective for persistent severe disability. Clinically, both questionnaires should be considered depending on the patient’s objective presentation of disability. The clinician needs to determine either ‘mild to moderate’ or ‘severe persistent disability’ after a thorough history and physical exam is completed so that the appropriate questionnaire can be administered. This helps support the clinician’s assessment of function, determine a patient’s level of disability and provide outcome information.

Davies, Claire C.1; Nitz, Arthur J. Psychometric properties of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire compared to the Oswestry Disability Index: a systematic review. Physical Therapy Reviews, Volume 14, Number 6, December 2009 , pp. 399-408(10)

Related posts:

1. A within-subjects trial to test the equivalence of online and paper outcome measures: the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire
2. Reliability, Construct Validity, and Responsiveness of the Neck Disability Index, Patient-Specific Functional Scale, and Numeric Pain Rating Scale in Patients with Cervical Radiculopathy.
3. Validity of the Neck Disability Index and Neck Pain and Disability Scale for measuring disability associated with chronic, non-traumatic neck pain
4. Responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire in Patients With Hand Injury
5. Psychometric Comparisons of 3 Functional Ambulation Measures for Patients With Stroke.